Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Short Course of Antibiotics Not Best for Kids' Ear Infections according to : nytimes

This was collected by Lucy William

We will quote to you the news of the best health sites Like : "nytimes" and the most famous medical experts : Catherine Saint Louis


daily : 2016-12-21 & on time : 19:37


As it stated in





Full Course of Antibiotics Is Best for Infant Ear Infections, Study Finds


Full Course of Antibiotics Is Best for Infant Ear Infections, Study Finds
image uploaded by "nytimes" site
Ear infections are often caused by bacteria, but some are caused by viruses and should not be treated with antibiotics.Babies with a middle-ear infection, known as acute otitis media, have pain, an eardrum that's at least moderately protruding, and other symptoms.Advertisement Continue reading the main storyThe new study included 520 babies 6 to 23 months old, the age group most prone to middle-ear infections.
about the details read more from here


Short Course of Antibiotics Not Best for Kids' Ear Infections


Short Course of Antibiotics Not Best for Kids' Ear Infections
image uploaded by "usnews" site
By Robert Preidt, HealthDay Reporter(HealthDay)WEDNESDAY, Dec. 21, 2016 (HealthDay News) -- A shorter period of antibiotic treatment for ear infections in young children does more harm than good, a new study finds.About three-quarters of children have ear infections in their first year of life.These infections are the most common reason why children are given antibiotics, the University of Pittsburgh researchers noted.
about the details read more from here


Cutting Back On Antibiotics Doesn't Work for Children's Ear Infections : Shots


Cutting Back On Antibiotics Doesn't Work for Children's Ear Infections : Shots
image uploaded by "npr" site
For Young Kids' Ear Infections, Longer Antibiotic Treatment Works BetterEnlarge this image vgajic/Getty Images vgajic/Getty ImagesResearchers looking into whether a shorter course of antibiotics would treat young children's ear infections as well as a longer course, found that not only was the shorter treatment less effective, it didn't reduce antibiotic resistance or side effects.The study, published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, comes as physicians and researchers are trying to come up with ways to curb the unnecessary use of antibiotics, including the possibility of using them for a shorter time against some common infections.The goal is to prevent bacteria from developing resistance to antibiotics.
about the details read more from here


To follow all the new news about

VIRUSES and INFECTIONS

No comments:

Post a Comment